Victor Lamar Clement v. State
This text of Victor Lamar Clement v. State (Victor Lamar Clement v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA,____________________ January 28, 2016
The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
A16D0219. VICTOR LAMAR CLEMENT v. THE STATE.
On December 31, 2015, Victor Lamar Clement filed an application for discretionary appeal seeking to challenge the trial court’s order of November 25, 2015, denying his motion for an out of time appeal.1 We lack jurisdiction. The denial of a motion for out of time appeal is directly appealable. See Lunsford v. State, 237 Ga. App. 696 (515 SE2d 198) (1999). Ordinarily, when a party applies for discretionary review of a directly appealable order, we grant the application under OCGA § 5-6-35 (j). To fall within this general rule, however, the application must be filed within 30 days of entry of the order or judgment to be appealed. OCGA § 5-6-35 (d); Hill v State, 204 Ga App 582 (420 SE2d 393) (1992). Here, Clement filed his application 36 days after the trial court’s order was entered. Accordingly, the application is untimely and is hereby DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. See Hill, supra.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia 01/28/2016 Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
, Clerk.
1 Clement’s direct appeal was dismissed as untimely. See Clement v. State, Case No. A13A1419, dismissed April 4, 2013.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Victor Lamar Clement v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/victor-lamar-clement-v-state-gactapp-2016.