Victor L. Jackson v. State of Texas

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 8, 2001
Docket07-00-00439-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Victor L. Jackson v. State of Texas (Victor L. Jackson v. State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Victor L. Jackson v. State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

NO. 07-00-0439-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL A

MAY 8, 2001

______________________________

VICTOR L. JACKSON, APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

_________________________________

FROM THE 338TH DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY;

NO. 838752; HONORABLE ELSA ALCALA, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before BOYD, C.J., and REAVIS and JOHNSON, JJ.

ON ABATEMENT AND REMAND

Appellant Victor L. Jackson pled guilty to the offense of aggravated robbery and,

on July 31, 2000, was sentenced to ten years confinement in the Institutional Division of

the Department of Criminal Justice. He gave timely notice of appeal from his conviction. Appellant’s appointed counsel has now filed an Anders brief in support of a motion

to withdraw in which she states that, after reviewing the entire appellate record, she is

convinced no reversible error exists and the appeal is without merit. Anders v. California,

386 U.S. 738, 744-45, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Counsel has provided

appellant with a copy of the brief and informed him that he has a right to review the record

and file a pro se brief if he so desires. Appellant has indicated to this court that he desires

to file a brief and was given until April 30, 2001, to do so. Appellant has now filed a motion

for extension of time indicating that the court clerk has refused to furnish him with a copy

of the record and he cannot file a brief without that record. He has also attached a copy

of a notification from the Harris County District Clerk that his request to obtain the record

was denied.

It is the duty of the trial court to provide an indigent defendant with an adequate

record on appeal. Newman v. State, 937 S.W.2d 1, 3 (Tex.Crim.App. 1996); Snoke v.

State, 780 S.W.2d 210, 212 (Tex.Crim.App. 1989). Given that appellant has expressed

his desire to file a pro se brief but asserts that he has been unable to obtain a copy of the

record, we believe a hearing should be held as provided in Texas Rule of Appellate

Procedure 38.8(b)(3). Accordingly, the appeal is abated and the cause remanded to the

338th District Court of Harris County.

Upon remand, the judge of the trial court shall immediately cause notice to be given

and to conduct a hearing to determine what steps need to be taken to facilitate and ensure

2 the provision of an appellate record to appellant. The court should also determine if any

other orders are necessary to ensure the proper and timely pursuit of appellant’s appeal.

In support of its determinations, the trial court shall prepare and file written findings

of fact and conclusions of law and cause them to be included in a supplemental clerk’s

record. The hearing proceedings shall be transcribed and included in a supplemental

reporter’s record. The supplemental clerk’s and reporter’s records shall be submitted to

the clerk of this court no later than June 8, 2001.

It is so ordered.

Per Curiam

Do not publish.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Newman v. State
937 S.W.2d 1 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1996)
Snoke v. State
780 S.W.2d 210 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Victor L. Jackson v. State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/victor-l-jackson-v-state-of-texas-texapp-2001.