Victor Jewell Black v. State
This text of Victor Jewell Black v. State (Victor Jewell Black v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dismiss and Opinion Filed November 18, 2020
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-20-00953-CR
VICTOR JEWELL BLACK, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 7 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F09-62734-Y
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Partida-Kipness, Pedersen, III, and Evans Opinion by Justice Pedersen, III Victor Jewell Black is attempting to appeal the trial court’s order denying his
October 21, 2020 “Motion for Release of Forensic’s Report of State’s Exhibit -14 –
Knife.”
Generally, this Court has jurisdiction to consider appeals by criminal
defendants only after a judgment of conviction. Gutierrez v. State, 307 S.W.3d 318,
321 (Tex. Crim. App. 2010); see Wright v. State, 969 S.W.2d 588, 589 (Tex. App.—
Dallas 1998, no pet.) (appellate courts may consider appeals by criminal defendants
only after conviction or entry of appealable order); Rabbani v. State, 494 S.W.3d
778, 780 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2016, pet. ref’d) (same). There are a few very limited exceptions to this general rule. See Wright, 969 S.W.2d at 589. In the
absence of an appealable judgment or order, we are without jurisdiction to hear an
appeal.
Black had the right to appeal the November 22, 2010 written judgment of
conviction, and he exercised that right. See Black v. State, No. 05-10-01558-CR,
2012 WL 26501, at *2 (Tex. App.—Dallas, Jan. 25, 2012, pet. ref’d) (mem. op., not
designated for publication). The trial court’s order denying Black’s request for a
copy of a report that was neither offered nor admitted as evidence at trial is not an
order from which the Texas Legislature has authorized an appeal.
Under these circumstances, we have no other option than to dismiss this
appeal for want of jurisdiction.
/Bill Pedersen, III// 200953f.u05 BILL PEDERSEN, III Do Not Publish JUSTICE TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b)
–2– Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT
VICTOR JEWELL BLACK, On Appeal from the Criminal District Appellant Court No. 7, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F09-62734-Y. No. 05-20-00953-CR V. Opinion delivered by Justice Pedersen, III. Justices Partida- THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Kipness and Evans participating.
Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS this appeal for want of jurisdiction.
Judgment entered this 18th day of November, 2020.
–3–
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Victor Jewell Black v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/victor-jewell-black-v-state-texapp-2020.