Victor Jaramillo v. Mayela Gurrolla Sosa
This text of Victor Jaramillo v. Mayela Gurrolla Sosa (Victor Jaramillo v. Mayela Gurrolla Sosa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-15-00078-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
VICTOR JARAMILLO, Appellant,
v.
MAYELA GURROLLA SOSA, Appellee.
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 7 of Hidalgo County, Texas
ORDER ABATING APPEAL Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Benavides and Perkes Per Curiam
This cause is before the Court on the record and appellant’s motion to abate the
appeal. According to the motion, the parties mediated this matter after the notice of
appeal was filed and reached an agreement; however, the parties currently dispute the
terms of the agreement and performance under the agreement. Appellant thus requests that we abate the appeal until the terms and enforcement of the mediated settlement
agreement have been resolved.
The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file and the
motion to abate, is of the opinion that the motion to abate the appeal should be granted.
Accordingly, the motion to abate the appeal is GRANTED and this appeal is ordered
ABATED for a period of sixty days from the date of this order. The Court directs appellant
to file, on or before the expiration of the abatement period, either: (1) a motion to
reinstate the appeal, accompanied by appellant’s brief in this matter, or (2) a motion to
dismiss the appeal pursuant to settlement.
PER CURIAM
Delivered and filed the 1st day of September, 2015.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Victor Jaramillo v. Mayela Gurrolla Sosa, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/victor-jaramillo-v-mayela-gurrolla-sosa-texapp-2015.