VICTOR ISME v. STATE OF FLORIDA
This text of VICTOR ISME v. STATE OF FLORIDA (VICTOR ISME v. STATE OF FLORIDA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
VICTOR ISME, Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.
No. 4D21-1522
[December 9, 2021]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Kirk Volker, Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-2016-CF-0003636 A.
Antony P. Ryan, Regional Counsel, and Paul O’Neil, Assistant Regional Counsel, Office of Criminal Conflict and Civil Regional Counsel, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Allan R. Geesey, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
DAMOORGIAN, CIKLIN and LEVINE, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
VICTOR ISME v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/victor-isme-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2021.