Victor Hicks v. State of Florida
This text of Victor Hicks v. State of Florida (Victor Hicks v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
Case No. 5D2024-2733 LT Case Nos. 2023-CF-1307-A 2024-CA-577 _____________________________
VICTOR HICKS,
Petitioner,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Respondent. _____________________________
Petition for Writ of Mandamus. Stephen E. Toner, Jr., Respondent Judge.
Victor Hicks, Malone, pro se.
No Appearance for Respondent.
May 16, 2025
PER CURIAM.
This Court previously denied Petitioner’s petition for writ of prohibition, which was treated as a writ of mandamus, arising from Hernando County Circuit Court Case Nos. 2023-CF-1307-A and 2024-CA-577. In light of Petitioner’s repeated filings that appear to be abusive, repetitive, malicious, or frivolous, Petitioner is cautioned that any further pro se filings in this Court relating to the aforementioned case numbers may result in sanctions. Such sanctions may include a bar on further pro se filing in this Court and referral to prison officials for disciplinary proceedings, which could include forfeiture of gain time. See § 944.279(1), Fla. Stat. (2024); State v. Spencer, 751 So. 2d 47 (Fla. 1999).
PETITIONER WARNED.
WALLIS, EISNAUGLE, and PRATT, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Victor Hicks v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/victor-hicks-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2025.