Victor Hicks v. Florida Department of Corrections, Mark S. Inch
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
No. 1D19-1333 _____________________________
VICTOR HICKS,
Petitioner,
v.
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MARK S. INCH,
Respondent. _____________________________
Petition for Writ of Mandamus—Original Jurisdiction.
May 21, 2019
PER CURIAM.
The petition for writ of mandamus is denied on the merits. See Clark v. Nichols M. N. P., 225 So. 3d 416 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017) (holding that to be entitled to mandamus relief compelling a ruling on a pending matter, a petitioner must demonstrate that he has noticed the matter for hearing in the lower tribunal).
ROBERTS, RAY, and WINSOR, JJ., concur. _____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________
Victor Hicks, pro se, Petitioner.
Kenneth S. Steely, General Counsel, Department of Corrections, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Victor Hicks v. Florida Department of Corrections, Mark S. Inch (Victor Hicks v. Florida Department of Corrections, Mark S. Inch) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.