Victor Hicks v. Florida Department of Corrections, Mark S. Inch

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Victor Hicks v. Florida Department of Corrections, Mark S. Inch

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 21, 2019

Docket19-1333

StatusPublished

This text of Victor Hicks v. Florida Department of Corrections, Mark S. Inch (Victor Hicks v. Florida Department of Corrections, Mark S. Inch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Victor Hicks v. Florida Department of Corrections, Mark S. Inch, (Fla. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________

No. 1D19-1333 _____________________________

VICTOR HICKS,

Petitioner,

v.

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MARK S. INCH,

Respondent. _____________________________

Petition for Writ of Mandamus—Original Jurisdiction.

May 21, 2019

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied on the merits. See Clark v. Nichols M. N. P., 225 So. 3d 416 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017) (holding that to be entitled to mandamus relief compelling a ruling on a pending matter, a petitioner must demonstrate that he has noticed the matter for hearing in the lower tribunal).

ROBERTS, RAY, and WINSOR, JJ., concur. _____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________

Victor Hicks, pro se, Petitioner.

Kenneth S. Steely, General Counsel, Department of Corrections, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI