Victor Hicks v. Department of Corrections and State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 21, 2025·No. 5D2024-2169·Published

Opinion

FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

Case No. 5D2024-2169 LT Case No. 2024-CA-000577

VICTOR HICKS,

Petitioner,

v.

DEPARTMENT of CORRECTIONS and STATE of FLORIDA,

Respondents.

Petition for Writ of Mandamus. Pamela Stinnette Vergara, Judge.

Victor Hicks, Malone, pro se.

No Appearance for Respondents.

February 21, 2025

PER CURIAM

Upon consideration of Petitioner’s recently filed third procedural motion, and this Court’s denial of Petitioner’s petition for writ of mandamus stemming from Hernando County Circuit Court Case No. 2024-CA-000577, September 20, 2024, we deny Petitioner’s motion. Because it appears that Petitioner’s filings are abusive, repetitive, malicious, or frivolous, Petitioner is cautioned that any further pro se filings in this Court asserting claims stemming from the identified case number may result in sanctions

such as a bar on pro se filing in this Court and referral to prison officials for disciplinary proceedings, which may include forfeiture of gain time. See § 944.279(1), Fla. Stat. (2025); State v. Spencer, 751 So. 2d 47 (Fla. 1999).

MOTION DENIED; PETITIONER CAUTIONED.

WALLIS, HARRIS and KILBANE, JJ., concur.

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Victor Hicks v. Department of Corrections and State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2025).

Victor Hicks v. Department of Corrections and State of Florida (Victor Hicks v. Department of Corrections and State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Spencer
751 So. 2d 47 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1999)