Victor Handal & Bro., Inc. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Victor Handal & Bro., Inc. v. United States

38 Cust. Ct. 505

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedMay 22, 1957

DocketNo. 60768; protests 236683-K, etc. (New York)

StatusPublished

This text of 38 Cust. Ct. 505 (Victor Handal & Bro., Inc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Victor Handal & Bro., Inc. v. United States, 38 Cust. Ct. 505 (cusc 1957).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items marked “A” consist of pearl ladders and strips similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 60159, the claim at 50 percent under paragraph 218 (f), as modified by T. D. 51802, supplemented by T. D. 51898, was sustained. The items marked “B,” stipulated to consist of silks carves or squares similar to those the subject of United States v. The Specialty House, Inc., Bryant & Heffernan, Inc., et al. (42 C. C. P. A. 136, C. A. D. 585), were held dutiable at 32)4 percent under paragraph 1210, as modified by T. D. 52739.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items marked “A” consist of pearl ladders and strips similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 60159, the claim at 50 percent under paragraph 218 (f), as modified by T. D. 51802, supplemented by T. D. 51898, was sustained. The items marked “B,” stipulated to consist of silks carves or squares similar to those the subject of United States v. The Specialty House, Inc., Bryant & Heffernan, Inc., et al. (42 C. C. P. A. 136, C. A. D. 585), were held dutiable at 32)4 percent under paragraph 1210, as modified by T. D. 52739.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

38 Cust. Ct. 505, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/victor-handal-bro-inc-v-united-states-cusc-1957.