Victor Handal & Bro., Inc. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Victor Handal & Bro., Inc. v. United States

38 Cust. Ct. 505

United States Customs Court·Decided May 22, 1957·No. No. 60768; protests 236683-K, etc. (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items marked “A” consist of pearl ladders and strips similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 60159, the claim at 50 percent under paragraph 218 (f), as modified by T. D. 51802, supplemented by T. D. 51898, was sustained. The items marked “B,” stipulated to consist of silks carves or squares similar to those the subject of United States v. The Specialty House, Inc., Bryant & Heffernan, Inc., et al. (42 C. C. P. A. 136, C. A. D. 585), were held dutiable at 32)4 percent under paragraph 1210, as modified by T. D. 52739.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items marked “A” consist of pearl ladders and strips similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 60159, the claim at 50 percent under paragraph 218 (f), as modified by T. D. 51802, supplemented by T. D. 51898, was sustained. The items marked “B,” stipulated to consist of silks carves or squares similar to those the subject of United States v. The Specialty House, Inc., Bryant & Heffernan, Inc., et al. (42 C. C. P. A. 136, C. A. D. 585), were held dutiable at 32)4 percent under paragraph 1210, as modified by T. D. 52739.

Victor Handal & Bro., Inc. v. United States, 38 Cust. Ct. 505 (cusc 1957).

Pincite

38 Cust. Ct. 505 (Victor Handal & Bro., Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.