Victor Fischel & Co. v. R. H. Macy & Co.
228 N.E.2d 404, 19 N.Y.2d 944, 281 N.Y.S.2d 349, 1967 N.Y. LEXIS 1482
This text of 228 N.E.2d 404 (Victor Fischel & Co. v. R. H. Macy & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Victor Fischel & Co. v. R. H. Macy & Co., 228 N.E.2d 404, 19 N.Y.2d 944, 281 N.Y.S.2d 349, 1967 N.Y. LEXIS 1482 (N.Y. 1967).
Opinion
Re argument ordered and counsel directed to address themselves particularly to the question of the impact of the 1964 liquor legislation on the Feld-Crawford Act. Case set down for reargument on May 31, 1967;- The Attorney-General and the State Liquor Authority are invited to submit briefs if so minded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
228 N.E.2d 404, 19 N.Y.2d 944, 281 N.Y.S.2d 349, 1967 N.Y. LEXIS 1482, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/victor-fischel-co-v-r-h-macy-co-ny-1967.