Victor E. Brown v. Virginia Department of Corrections

Fourth Circuit

Victor E. Brown v. Virginia Department of Corrections

56 F.3d 60, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 19068, 1995 WL 323863

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMay 31, 1995

Docket95-6328

StatusPublished

This text of 56 F.3d 60 (Victor E. Brown v. Virginia Department of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Victor E. Brown v. Virginia Department of Corrections, 56 F.3d 60, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 19068, 1995 WL 323863 (4th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

56 F.3d 60
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Victor E. BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 95-6328.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 20, 1995.
Decided: May 31, 1995.

Victor E. Brown, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Brown v. Virginia Dep't of Corrections, No. CA-95-106-R (W.D.Va. Feb. 9, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

56 F.3d 60
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Victor E. BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 95-6328.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 20, 1995.
Decided: May 31, 1995.

Victor E. Brown, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Brown v. Virginia Dep't of Corrections, No. CA-95-106-R (W.D.Va. Feb. 9, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

56 F.3d 60, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 19068, 1995 WL 323863, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/victor-e-brown-v-virginia-department-of-correction-ca4-1995.