Victor Day v. Bd. of Regents

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided May 22, 1996·No. 95-4073·Published

Opinion

No. 95-4073NE

Victor Day, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the District * of Nebraska.

Board of Regents of the * University of Nebraska; * [PUBLISHED] Pill Soon Song, *

*

Appellees. *

Submitted: May 13, 1996

Filed: May 22, 1996

Before McMILLIAN, FAGG, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Victor Day appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment in Day's civil rights action. Day v. Board of Regents, 911 F. Supp. 1228 (D. Neb. 1995). Day contends the University of Nebraska's decision to pay him less than other professors in his department was age-based and deprived him of an array of constitutional rights. Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties' briefs, we conclude Day is not entitled to relief. Because the controlling law is clear, our review satisfies us that an opinion would have no precedential value. Accordingly, we affirm without further discussion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Victor Day v. Bd. of Regents, (8th Cir. 1996).

Victor Day v. Bd. of Regents (Victor Day v. Bd. of Regents) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Day v. Board of Regents of the University of Nebraska
911 F. Supp. 1228 (D. Nebraska, 1995)