Victor Day v. Bd. of Regents
This text of Victor Day v. Bd. of Regents (Victor Day v. Bd. of Regents) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
_____________
No. 95-4073NE _____________
Victor Day, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the District * of Nebraska. Board of Regents of the * University of Nebraska; * [PUBLISHED] Pill Soon Song, * * Appellees. * _____________
Submitted: May 13, 1996
Filed: May 22, 1996 _____________
Before McMILLIAN, FAGG, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges. _____________
PER CURIAM.
Victor Day appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment in Day's civil rights action. Day v. Board of Regents, 911 F. Supp. 1228 (D. Neb. 1995). Day contends the University of Nebraska's decision to pay him less than other professors in his department was age-based and deprived him of an array of constitutional rights. Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties' briefs, we conclude Day is not entitled to relief. Because the controlling law is clear, our review satisfies us that an opinion would have no precedential value. Accordingly, we affirm without further discussion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Victor Day v. Bd. of Regents, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/victor-day-v-bd-of-regents-ca8-1996.