Victor Barsenas, Jr. v. State
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-19-00365-CR
Victor BARSENAS, Jr., Appellant
v.
The STATE of Texas, Appellee
From the 187th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2019CR1810W Honorable Stephanie R. Boyd, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Irene Rios, Justice Beth Watkins, Justice Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice
Delivered and Filed: August 28, 2019
DISMISSED
Pursuant to a plea-bargain agreement, appellant pleaded guilty to continuous violence
against the family. See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 25.11. The trial court assessed punishment at six
years’ imprisonment. On May 10, 2019, the trial court signed a certification of defendant’s right
to appeal stating that this “is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” See
TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2).
In a plea bargain case, a defendant may appeal “those matters that were raised by written
motion filed and ruled on before trial,” or “after getting the trial court’s permission to appeal.” Id. 04-19-00365-CR
25.2(a)(2). The clerk’s record, which contains a written plea bargain, establishes the punishment
assessed by the court does not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed
to by the defendant. See id. The clerk’s record does not include a written motion filed and ruled
upon before trial; nor does it indicate that the trial court gave its permission to appeal. See id. The
trial court’s certification, therefore, appears to accurately reflect that this is a plea-bargain case and
that appellant does not have a right to appeal. We must dismiss an appeal “if a certification that
shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record.” Id. 25.2(d).
We, therefore, warned appellant that this appeal would be dismissed pursuant to Texas
Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2(d), unless an amended trial court certification showing that he
had the right to appeal was made part of the appellate record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d), 37.1;
Daniels v. State, 110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2003, order). No such amended trial
court certification has been filed. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal pursuant to Rule 25.2(d).
DO NOT PUBLISH
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Victor Barsenas, Jr. v. State (Victor Barsenas, Jr. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.