Victor Anthony Hulse-Guerrero v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

548 F.2d 846
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 25, 1977
Docket76-1295
StatusPublished

This text of 548 F.2d 846 (Victor Anthony Hulse-Guerrero v. Immigration & Naturalization Service) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Victor Anthony Hulse-Guerrero v. Immigration & Naturalization Service, 548 F.2d 846 (9th Cir. 1977).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The petitioner, Victor Anthony HulseGuerrero, a native and citizen of British Honduras, appeals from a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals which denied his requests for discretionary relief under 8 U.S.C. §§ 1251(f), 1254(e), and 1255.

Under former section 245(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1255(a), the status of certain aliens could be adjusted by the Attorney General in his discretion. However, section 245(c), 8 U.S.C. § 1255(c), provided:

“The provisions of this section shall not be applicable to any alien who is a native of any country of the Western Hemisphere . . . .”

Thus, as a native of British Honduras and therefore a native of a country of the Western Hemisphere, appellant-petitioner was statutorily ineligible for adjustment of status. The Board of Immigration Appeals relied upon this exclusion in denying him discretionary relief.

On October 20, 1976, while this case was on appeal, the Congress of the United States enacted Public Law No. 94-571, 90 Stat. 2703, which became effective on January 1, 1977. This law abolishes the distinction in treatment of aliens under section 245(c) and makes adjustment of status by the Attorney General equally available to natives of both the Western and Eastern Hemispheres. Petitioner is now entitled to apply for this discretionary relief.

Because a grant of status adjustment would moot all the issues on appeal, we remand the case to the Board of Immigration Appeals to allow time to permit petitioner to make an application for status adjustment and for a decision by the Board thereafter in the light of Public Law No. 94-571 and the application. In the event no application is filed within 30 days, or in the event the application is denied, the present decision of the Board shall stand affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
548 F.2d 846, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/victor-anthony-hulse-guerrero-v-immigration-naturalization-service-ca9-1977.