Victor Acosta v. State
Opinion
MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-10-00888-CR
Victor ACOSTA, Appellant
v.
The STATE of Texas, Appellee
From the 175th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2009CR10510 Honorable Mary D. Roman, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice Rebecca Simmons, Justice
Delivered and Filed: March 9, 2011
DISMISSED
The trial court signed a certification of defendant’s right to appeal stating that this “is a
plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal” and “defendant has waived the
right of appeal.” See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). Rule 25.2(d) provides, “The appeal must be
dismissed if a certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made
part of the record under these rules.” Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d). Accordingly, on December 29,
2010, this court issued an order stating this appeal would be dismissed pursuant to Rule 25.2(d) 04-10-00888-CR
unless an amended trial court certification that shows defendant has the right of appeal was made
part of the appellate record. See Daniels v. State,110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.—San Antonio
2003, order); Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d); 37.1. No amended trial court certification has been filed;
therefore, this appeal is dismissed.
Do not publish
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Victor Acosta v. State (Victor Acosta v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.