Victor A. Huerte v. Ricky Dixon, Secretary, Department of Corrections
This text of Victor A. Huerte v. Ricky Dixon, Secretary, Department of Corrections (Victor A. Huerte v. Ricky Dixon, Secretary, Department of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed September 3, 2025. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D25-0647 Lower Tribunal No. F07-1958-C ________________
Victor A. Huerte, Petitioner,
vs.
Ricky Dixon, Secretary Department of Corrections, et al., Respondent.
A Case of Original Jurisdiction – Habeas Corpus.
Victor A. Huerte, in proper person.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General, and Kayla Heather McNab, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
Before EMAS, LOBREE and GOODEN, JJ.
PER CURIAM. Having reviewed the petition for habeas corpus and determined it to
be without merit, it is hereby denied. See Gordon v. State, 863 So. 2d 1215,
1221 (Fla. 2003) (holding alleged violation of Vienna Convention was
procedurally barred where not raised on direct appeal, and petitioner failed
to establish he had standing to assert such claim); Maharaj v. State, 778 So.
2d 944, 959 (Fla. 2000) (same); see also Darling v. State, 808 So. 2d 145,
166 (Fla. 2002) (holding petitioner failed to demonstrate he was prejudiced
from a purported violation of the Vienna Convention).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Victor A. Huerte v. Ricky Dixon, Secretary, Department of Corrections, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/victor-a-huerte-v-ricky-dixon-secretary-department-of-corrections-fladistctapp-2025.