Vicky Wilkerson v. State

Opinion

I)isrnissed and Opinion Filed February 20 2013

In The Vuurt nf Appeah 3Fiftl! 3istrirt nt ixa at atta No. 05-13-00102-CR No. 05-13-00103-CR

VICKY REE WILKERSON, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 291st Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause Nos. F11-42006-U, F12-55766-U

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Lang-Miers, Murphy, and Fillmore Opinion by Justice Lang-Miers Vicky Ree Wilkerson pleaded guilty to possession of methamphetamine in an amount of

four grams or more but less than 200 grams and tampering with a government record, In the

methamphetamine case, appellant pleaded true to one enhancement paragraph. In the tampering

case, she pleaded true to two enhancement paragraphs. Pursuant to plea agreements, the trial

court assessed punishment at nine years’ imprisonment in each case. Appellant waived her right

to appeal in conjunction with the plea agreements. See Blanco v. State, 18 S.W.3d 218, 219—20

(Tex. Crim. App. 2000). We dismiss the appeals for want of jurisdiction. /

ELHIAN

Do Not Publish TEX, R. App. P.47

130102F.U05 (Cuitrt vf Aprahi FiftI! Thstrirt 01 (LCXd at Oa11a JUDGMENT

VICKY REE WILKERSON, Appellant On Appeal from the 291st Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas No. O5i3MOlO2CR V. Trial Court Cause No. Fl l-42OO6U. Opinion delivered by Justice Lang-Miers, TI-IE STATE OF TEXAS. Appellee Justices Murphy and Fillmore participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

th 20 Judgment entered this day of February, 2013.

L4 ELIZAI3E’li I LANG—rvl II. S ...

J1JS’l I(E / (!.tuirt tf \i.’t’ii1 111111! :Ijitrirt of ii’xa tt 3a1La JUDGMENT

VICKY REE WILKERSON. Appellant On Appeal from the 29 1st Judicial District Court, Dallas County. Texas No. 051 3-00103CR V Trial Court Cause No. Fl 255766-U. Opinion delivered by Justice LangMiers, THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appel lee Justices Murphy and Fillmore participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal for want of jurisdiction.