Vicky v. United States

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedAugust 28, 2014
Docket12-2752
StatusPublished

This text of Vicky v. United States (Vicky v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Vicky v. United States, (8th Cir. 2014).

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________

No. 12-2752 ___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

Robert M. Fast

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee

------------------------------

Vicky, Child Pornography Victim

lllllllllllllllllllllInterested party - Appellant ___________________________

No. 12-2769 ___________________________

In re: Vicky, Child Pornography Victim

lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner ____________

Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Nebraska - Lincoln ____________ Submitted: August 20, 2014 Filed: August 28, 2014 [Published] ____________

Before MURPHY, BENTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. ____________

PER CURIAM.

This case is on remand from the Supreme Court of the United States. Vicky, Child Pornography Victim v. Fast, 134 S. Ct. 1934 (2014). Robert M. Fast pled guilty to receiving and distributing child pornography in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(a)(2). Vicky challenged the district court’s restitution order. This court dismissed her appeal, finding that the defendant must “proximately cause the victim’s losses.” Vicky, Child Pornography Victim v. Fast, 709 F.3d 712, 721 (8th Cir. 2013). The Supreme Court vacated this court’s judgment and remanded for further consideration in light of Paroline v. United States, 134 S. Ct. 1710 (2014). In Paroline, the Court found that 18 U.S.C. § 2259 requires “restitution in an amount that comports with the defendant’s relative role in the causal process that underlies the victim’s general losses.” Paroline, 134 S. Ct. at 1727.

*******

The case is remanded to the district court for further consideration in light of Paroline. ______________________________

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Vicky v. United States
709 F.3d 712 (Eighth Circuit, 2013)
Paroline v. United States
134 S. Ct. 1710 (Supreme Court, 2014)
Vicky v. Fast
134 S. Ct. 1934 (Supreme Court, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Vicky v. United States, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vicky-v-united-states-ca8-2014.