Vickson v. State
This text of 688 So. 2d 370 (Vickson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The denial of appellant’s successive motion for post-conviction relief is affirmed. Appellant shall file no more petitions or motions regarding his conviction and sentence in case number CR89-4421. See Johnson v. State, 680 So.2d 1101 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996); Helms v. State, 659 So.2d 1138 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995); Orr v. State, 657 So.2d 1271 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995). Should he do so he will be in contempt of this court and will be subject to punishment, including a sentence of consecutive time. Mobley v. State, 492 So.2d 734 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986).
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
688 So. 2d 370, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 159, 1997 WL 14335, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vickson-v-state-fladistctapp-1997.