Vicksburg, Shreveport & Texas Railroad v. Hempkin

15 La. Ann. 523
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided July 15, 1860·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Mereick, O. J.

There is a motion in this case to dismiss the appeal, which must prevail. The order of the Judge allowed a devolutive appeal, on giving bond in the sum of two hundred dollars.

The bond given was in the sum of one hundred dollars. The appellants offer to substitute a new bond in this court.

The case of Nouvet, syndic, v. Armant, seems to be decisive on this motion. The bond being defective at the time the appeal was brought up, cannot be cured by the substitution of a now bond in this court. 12 An. 72.

It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed, that the appeal in this case be dismissed, at the costs of the appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Vicksburg, Shreveport & Texas Railroad v. Hempkin, 15 La. Ann. 523 (La. 1860).

15 La. Ann. 523 (Vicksburg, Shreveport & Texas Railroad v. Hempkin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Alfred Hiller Co. v. Hotel Grunewald Co.
70 So. 234 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1914)