Vicksburg Railway & Light Co. v. Miles

40 So. 738, 88 Miss. 204
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedApril 15, 1906
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 40 So. 738 (Vicksburg Railway & Light Co. v. Miles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Vicksburg Railway & Light Co. v. Miles, 40 So. 738, 88 Miss. 204 (Mich. 1906).

Opinion

Calhoon, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

It cannot be doubted that the injury to the horse was caused by a loose connection of the bond wires, preventing proper ground connection, thus causing an arc along the track on the passage of the train. To show that this did not arise from an unavoidable accident, not to be foreseen or provided against, but that it was because of long-continued negligence over the whole of the road, and which was the subject of complaint to the company,.as cumulative evidence that electricity caused the hurt, it was competent to show other shocks to other animals in other parts of the line, operated by one current, and complaint made. See 15 Cyc., 478, and notes. This involves no danger of a confusion of issues. An electric current over a car line is a continuous stream, and, properly bonded and connected, is free from danger, and a matter of easy proof by the operator. In showing that electricity, negligently controlled, was the origin of the particular event, it [209]*209was properly allowed to show other instances of similar results along the same circuit. 1 Wigmore on Evidence, secs. 441-44:3; Id., note to page 542. It is of the same nature as evidence of frequent emission of sparks by an engine to show its negligent construction, and adding to the probability that it set out the particular fire. An electrical current over the same conductor is just as much one thing as an engine is. 1 Wigmore on Evidence, sec. 452, et seq.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Arkansas Power & Light Co. v. Johnson
538 S.W.2d 541 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1976)
Mississippi Power & Light Co. v. Goosby
192 So. 453 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1939)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
40 So. 738, 88 Miss. 204, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vicksburg-railway-light-co-v-miles-miss-1906.