Vicksburg & Meridian Railroad v. Hamilton

62 Miss. 503
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedApril 15, 1885
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 62 Miss. 503 (Vicksburg & Meridian Railroad v. Hamilton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Vicksburg & Meridian Railroad v. Hamilton, 62 Miss. 503 (Mich. 1885).

Opinion

Campbell, C. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The evidence shows that the mule was killed by the running of a locomotive or cars of the appellant, and there is nothing to show the circumstances of the killing. The presumption of the want of reasonable skill and care on the part of the servants of the appellant in reference to the injury must therefore prevail. Code, § 1059. This statute devolves on the railroad company, whose locomotives or cars in running inflict injury, to exculpate itself from blame by showing that the circumstances under which the injury was done were such as to free it from liability. It cannot rely on presumptions or conjectures. It must show the facts attending the injury and exonerate itself. The facts did not appear in this case, and for all that was shown the mule may have been unnecessarily and improperly killed. The appellant must suffer the consequences of its failure to show the circumstances.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hamel v. Southern Ry. Co.
74 So. 276 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1917)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
62 Miss. 503, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vicksburg-meridian-railroad-v-hamilton-miss-1885.