Vicks v. Daimlerchrysler Corporation
711 N.W.2d 370, 474 Mich. 1096, 2006 Mich. LEXIS 531
Opinion
Marshalene VICKS, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 30, 2005 *371 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
CORRIGAN, J., would deny leave to appeal but continues to adhere to her concurring statement in Donoho v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 474 Mich. 1057, 708 N.W.2d 444 (2006).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Vicks v. Daimlerchrysler Corporation, 711 N.W.2d 370, 474 Mich. 1096, 2006 Mich. LEXIS 531 (Mich. 2006).
711 N.W.2d 370 (Vicks v. Daimlerchrysler Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Carpenter
711 N.W.2d 370 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2006)