Home/Michigan Supreme Court/Vicks v. Daimlerchrysler Corporation

Vicks v. Daimlerchrysler Corporation

711 N.W.2d 370, 474 Mich. 1096, 2006 Mich. LEXIS 531
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 27, 2006
Docket130291
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 711 N.W.2d 370 (Vicks v. Daimlerchrysler Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Vicks v. Daimlerchrysler Corporation, 711 N.W.2d 370, 474 Mich. 1096, 2006 Mich. LEXIS 531 (Mich. 2006).

Opinion

711 N.W.2d 370 (2006)
474 Mich. 1096

Marshalene VICKS, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant.

Docket No. 130291, COA No. 263789.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

March 27, 2006.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 30, 2005 *371 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

CORRIGAN, J., would deny leave to appeal but continues to adhere to her concurring statement in Donoho v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 474 Mich. 1057, 708 N.W.2d 444 (2006).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Carpenter
711 N.W.2d 370 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
711 N.W.2d 370, 474 Mich. 1096, 2006 Mich. LEXIS 531, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vicks-v-daimlerchrysler-corporation-mich-2006.