Vickrey v. Jones

California Supreme Court

Vickrey v. Jones

129 P. 276, 164 Cal. 774, 1912 Cal. LEXIS 364

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 23, 1912

DocketL.A. No. 2955.

StatusPublished

This text of 129 P. 276 (Vickrey v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Vickrey v. Jones, 129 P. 276, 164 Cal. 774, 1912 Cal. LEXIS 364 (Cal. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

The facts in this case are in all essential particulars the same in effect as in the second contract considered in the case of Vickrey v. Maier, ante, p. 384, [129 P. 273], this day decided. The parties to this appeal have stipulated that the decision of the appeal in that case shall control the decision here. Upon the reasons stated in the opinion in that case it is obvious that the judgment of the court below in this case for the defendants was erroneous.

The judgment is reversed.

Angellotti, J., and Sloss, J., concurred.

*Page 775

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The facts in this case are in all essential particulars the same in effect as in the second contract considered in the case of Vickrey v. Maier, ante, p. 384, [129 P. 273], this day decided. The parties to this appeal have stipulated that the decision of the appeal in that case shall control the decision here. Upon the reasons stated in the opinion in that case it is obvious that the judgment of the court below in this case for the defendants was erroneous.

The judgment is reversed.

Angellotti, J., and Sloss, J., concurred.

*Page 775

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

129 P. 276, 164 Cal. 774, 1912 Cal. LEXIS 364, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vickrey-v-jones-cal-1912.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack