Vickie Lewis v. Soulage Med Spa, LLC D/B/A Soulage Wellness & Aesthetic Center Dr. Pompeyo Chavez And Monica Chavez

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedAugust 30, 2024
Docket03-24-00480-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Vickie Lewis v. Soulage Med Spa, LLC D/B/A Soulage Wellness & Aesthetic Center Dr. Pompeyo Chavez And Monica Chavez (Vickie Lewis v. Soulage Med Spa, LLC D/B/A Soulage Wellness & Aesthetic Center Dr. Pompeyo Chavez And Monica Chavez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Vickie Lewis v. Soulage Med Spa, LLC D/B/A Soulage Wellness & Aesthetic Center Dr. Pompeyo Chavez And Monica Chavez, (Tex. Ct. App. 2024).

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-24-00480-CV

Vickie Lewis, Appellant

v.

Soulage Med Spa, LLC d/b/a Soulage Wellness & Aesthetic Center; Dr. Pompeyo Chavez; and Monica Chavez, Appellees

FROM THE 21ST DISTRICT COURT OF BASTROP COUNTY NO. 1696-21 THE HONORABLE CARSON TALMADGE CAMPBELL, JUDGE PRESIDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The clerk’s record in this appeal was due for filing in this Court on August 12,

2024. On August 12, 2024, we notified appellant that no clerk’s record had been filed due to her

failure to pay or make arrangements to pay the trial clerk’s fee for preparing the clerk’s record.

The notice requested that appellant make arrangements for the clerk’s record and submit a status

report regarding this appeal by August 22, 2024. Further, the notice advised appellant that her

failure to comply with this request could result in the dismissal of the appeal for want of

prosecution. To date, appellant has not filed a status report or otherwise responded to this Court’s

notice, and the clerk’s record has not been filed.

If a trial-court clerk fails to file the clerk’s record due to an appellant’s failure to

pay or make arrangements to pay for the clerk’s fee for preparing the record, the appellate court may dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless the appellant was entitled to proceed without

payment of costs. Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). In this case, appellant has not established that she is

entitled to proceed without payment of costs. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 145. Because appellant has

failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk’s fee for preparing the clerk’s record, this

appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.

__________________________________________ Chari L. Kelly, Justice

Before Chief Byrne, Justices Triana and Kelly

Dismissed for Want of Prosecution

Filed: August 30, 2024

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Vickie Lewis v. Soulage Med Spa, LLC D/B/A Soulage Wellness & Aesthetic Center Dr. Pompeyo Chavez And Monica Chavez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vickie-lewis-v-soulage-med-spa-llc-dba-soulage-wellness-aesthetic-texapp-2024.