Vickie J. Vermillion v. Unifund CCR Partners

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedAugust 23, 2007
Docket13-07-00242-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Vickie J. Vermillion v. Unifund CCR Partners (Vickie J. Vermillion v. Unifund CCR Partners) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Vickie J. Vermillion v. Unifund CCR Partners, (Tex. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion



NUMBER 13-07-00242-CV



COURT OF APPEALS



THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS



CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

_____________________________________________________ _



VICKIE J. VERMILLION, Appellant,



v.


UNIFUND CCR PARTNERS, Appellee.

_______________________________________________________



On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2
of Montgomery County, Texas.


MEMORANDUM OPINION



Before Justices Yañez, Garza, and Benavides

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam



Appellant, VICKIE J. VERMILLION, perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the County Court at Law No. 2 of Montgomery County, Texas, in cause number 05-10-09168. The clerk's record was filed on March 26, 2007. The reporter's record was filed on March 21, 2007. Appellant's brief was due on April 25, 2007. To date, no appellate brief has been received.

When the appellant has failed to file a brief in the time prescribed, the Court may dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution, unless the appellant reasonably explains the failure and the appellee is not significantly injured by the appellant's failure to timely file a brief. Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1).

On June 7, 2007, notice was given to all parties that this appeal was subject to dismissal pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1). Appellant was given ten days to explain why the cause should not be dismissed for failure to file a brief. To date, no response has been received.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, appellant's failure to file a proper appellate brief, this Court's notice, and appellant's failure to respond, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION.

PER CURIAM



Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed

this the 23rd day of August, 2007.



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Vickie J. Vermillion v. Unifund CCR Partners, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vickie-j-vermillion-v-unifund-ccr-partners-texapp-2007.