Vicki Pruitt Johnson v. John Gilmer Johnson, Joel David Johnson, Judy Fowler, Ross Griffith, Cary Schroeder, James Holliday, Dyann McCully, John Dowdy, and William Ridgeway

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 28, 2018
Docket02-18-00011-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Vicki Pruitt Johnson v. John Gilmer Johnson, Joel David Johnson, Judy Fowler, Ross Griffith, Cary Schroeder, James Holliday, Dyann McCully, John Dowdy, and William Ridgeway (Vicki Pruitt Johnson v. John Gilmer Johnson, Joel David Johnson, Judy Fowler, Ross Griffith, Cary Schroeder, James Holliday, Dyann McCully, John Dowdy, and William Ridgeway) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Vicki Pruitt Johnson v. John Gilmer Johnson, Joel David Johnson, Judy Fowler, Ross Griffith, Cary Schroeder, James Holliday, Dyann McCully, John Dowdy, and William Ridgeway, (Tex. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

NO. 02-18-00011-CV

VICKI PRUITT JOHNSON APPELLANT

V.

JOHN GILMER JOHNSON, JOEL APPELLEES DAVID JOHNSON, JUDY FOWLER, ROSS GRIFFITH, CARY SCHROEDER, JAMES HOLLIDAY, DYANN MCCULLY, JOHN DOWDY, AND WILLIAM RIDGEWAY

------------

FROM THE 96TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY TRIAL COURT NO. 096-288873-16

MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 AND JUDGMENT ------------

On April 18, 2018, we notified appellant that her brief had not been filed as

required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6(a). See Tex. R. App. P.

38.6(a). We stated that we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. unless appellant filed with the court within ten days an appellant’s brief and a

motion reasonably explaining the failure to file an appellant’s brief and the need

for an extension. See Tex. R. App. P. 10.5(b), 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). We did not

receive an appellant’s brief or motion from appellant within ten days of April 18,

2018.

Instead, appellant filed an untimely “Motion to Extend Time for Filing Brief”

on May 15, 2018. That untimely motion is DENIED.

Because appellant has failed to file a brief after having been given an

opportunity to provide a reasonable explanation for the failure, we dismiss the

appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: PITTMAN, J.; SUDDERTH, C.J.; and BIRDWELL, J.

DELIVERED: June 28, 2018

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Vicki Pruitt Johnson v. John Gilmer Johnson, Joel David Johnson, Judy Fowler, Ross Griffith, Cary Schroeder, James Holliday, Dyann McCully, John Dowdy, and William Ridgeway, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vicki-pruitt-johnson-v-john-gilmer-johnson-joel-david-johnson-judy-texapp-2018.