Vickery v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Vickery v. State

130 S.E. 704, 34 Ga. App. 673, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 474

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedDecember 15, 1925

Docket16816

StatusPublished

This text of 130 S.E. 704 (Vickery v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Vickery v. State, 130 S.E. 704, 34 Ga. App. 673, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 474 (Ga. Ct. App. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

Luke, J.

The conviction of the defendant was amply authorized by the evidence, and has the approval of the trial judge. There was no error in the charge of the court. The assignments of error upon the court’s failure to charge as requested, and upon the excerpts from the charge of the court, are without merit, when the charge is read in its entirety. The defendant has had a legal trial, and for no reason appearing in the record did the court err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodioorth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luke, J.

The conviction of the defendant was amply authorized by the evidence, and has the approval of the trial judge. There was no error in the charge of the court. The assignments of error upon the court’s failure to charge as requested, and upon the excerpts from the charge of the court, are without merit, when the charge is read in its entirety. The defendant has had a legal trial, and for no reason appearing in the record did the court err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodioorth, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

130 S.E. 704, 34 Ga. App. 673, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 474, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vickery-v-state-gactapp-1925.