Vickery v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Vickery v. State

36 Ga. App. 214

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedDecember 14, 1920

Docket17700

StatusPublished

This text of 36 Ga. App. 214 (Vickery v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Vickery v. State, 36 Ga. App. 214 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920).

Pincite

Opinion

Luke, J.

Vickery’s conviction in the city court of Eairburn, for violating the prohibition statute, was certioraried to the superior court. Vickery contended that the evidence did not authorize his conviction, and that upon the ground of newly discovered evidence he should be granted a new trial. Upon the petition for certiorari and the answer thereto, his conviction was authorized, and the alleged newly discovered evidence was not, in our opinion, sufficient to produce a different result upon another trial. The judge of the superior court, therefore, did not err in overruling the certiorari.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., concurs. Bloodworth, J., absent on account of illness.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luke, J.

Vickery’s conviction in the city court of Eairburn, for violating the prohibition statute, was certioraried to the superior court. Vickery contended that the evidence did not authorize his conviction, and that upon the ground of newly discovered evidence he should be granted a new trial. Upon the petition for certiorari and the answer thereto, his conviction was authorized, and the alleged newly discovered evidence was not, in our opinion, sufficient to produce a different result upon another trial. The judge of the superior court, therefore, did not err in overruling the certiorari.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., concurs. Bloodworth, J., absent on account of illness.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

36 Ga. App. 214, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vickery-v-state-gactapp-1920.