Vickery v. Evans
This text of 16 Ind. 331 (Vickery v. Evans) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Suit before a justice, upon the following account:
“August) 3,1858.
“'Lemuel Evans, To Jenkins Vickery, Dr.
To 25 bushels of corn at 75 cts. per bushel, - - $18.75”
Answer as follows:
“Jenkins Vickery, To Lemuel Evans, Dr.
January) 1858. To pasturing 3 horses 2 months, - $ 1.00
March 10. To pasturing 95 cattle 22 days, - - 32.50
To order on YicJcery) and accepted, from B. B. Moffit to Martin Merry) and assigned to Evans, (which is set out by copy)......5.00
$11.50”
On the trial in the Common Pleas, to which the cause was appealed, there was proof of the getting of the corn by the defendant, and of the value of it at the time it was got, but there was no proof of any special contract in relation to it. The plaintiff thus necessarily rested his case upon a contract of sale, and not upon a conversion of the corn, as he did not show any tortious taking or consumption of the corn, nor prove any demand for its return.
He offered, before the close of the trial, to prove the price of corn at the time of the commencement of the suit, a year after the corn was sold, and the Court refused the evidence.
As the case stood, this was not erroneous. As the plaintiff [332]*332relied upon a sale of the corn at its delivery, the price at that date was all he was entitled to recover.
The judgment is affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
16 Ind. 331, 1861 Ind. LEXIS 165, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vickery-v-evans-ind-1861.