Vickers v. Mcdowell

District Court, W.D. Louisiana·Decided March 22, 2024·No. 1:23-cv-01646·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION

ANDREA LAVELLE VICKERS #16301-006 CASE NO. 1:23-CV-01646 SEC P VERSUS JUDGE ROBERT R. SUMMERHAYS C.0. MCDOWELL, ET AL. MAGISTRATE JUDGE PEREZ-MONTES

JUDGMENT For the reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein (ECF No. 19), noting the absence of objection thereto, and concurring with the Magistrate Judge’s findings under the applicable law; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiff's claims against all Defendants under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971) are DENIED and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B) and 1915A. Because the Magistrate Judge is issuing a separate Order regarding service of the federal tort claim, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion for Order of Service (ECF No. 17) and the Motion for Extension for Service (ECF No. 18) are DENIED as MOOT. THUS, DONE AND SIGNED in Chambers this afran of March, 2024.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDQE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Vickers v. Mcdowell, (W.D. La. 2024).

Vickers v. Mcdowell (Vickers v. Mcdowell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related