Vickers v. Jessup

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Vickers v. Jessup

632 A.2d 701, 227 Conn. 922, 1993 Conn. LEXIS 326

CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut

DecidedSeptember 15, 1993

DocketSC 14834

StatusPublished

This text of 632 A.2d 701 (Vickers v. Jessup) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Vickers v. Jessup, 632 A.2d 701, 227 Conn. 922, 1993 Conn. LEXIS 326 (Colo. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 32 Conn. App. 360 (AC 11613), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. In a civil case, must a statement of a party opponent be inconsistent with the party’s position at trial in order to be admissible?

“2. If the answer to question 1. is no, was the ruling of the trial court excluding the plaintiff’s November, 1989 letter harmful error?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 32 Conn. App. 360 (AC 11613), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. In a civil case, must a statement of a party opponent be inconsistent with the party’s position at trial in order to be admissible?

“2. If the answer to question 1. is no, was the ruling of the trial court excluding the plaintiff’s November, 1989 letter harmful error?”

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

632 A.2d 701, 227 Conn. 922, 1993 Conn. LEXIS 326, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vickers-v-jessup-conn-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack