Vickers v. Jessup

632 A.2d 701, 227 Conn. 922, 1993 Conn. LEXIS 326
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided September 15, 1993·No. SC 14834·Published

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 32 Conn. App. 360 (AC 11613), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. In a civil case, must a statement of a party opponent be inconsistent with the party’s position at trial in order to be admissible?

“2. If the answer to question 1. is no, was the ruling of the trial court excluding the plaintiff’s November, 1989 letter harmful error?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Vickers v. Jessup, 632 A.2d 701, 227 Conn. 922, 1993 Conn. LEXIS 326 (Colo. 1993).

632 A.2d 701 (Vickers v. Jessup) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Vickers v. Jessup
629 A.2d 457 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1993)