Vickers v. City of Gainesville
This text of 171 S.E. 299 (Vickers v. City of Gainesville) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The petition prayed for an injunction to prevent the defendants from enforcing, as to the plaintiffs, an ordinance of the City of Gainesville, requiring payment of a tax for conducting the business of undertaking in the city. Upon interlocutory hearing the evidence was conflicting as to whether the plaintiffs carried on the business of undertaking within the limits of that city. The court refused an injunction. The case falls within the well-settled rule of this court, that the discretion of the trial judge in granting or refusing an injunction will not be interfered with, unless there is a manifest abuse of discretion.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
171 S.E. 299, 177 Ga. 793, 1933 Ga. LEXIS 428, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vickers-v-city-of-gainesville-ga-1933.