Vickers v. City of Gainesville

171 S.E. 299, 177 Ga. 793, 1933 Ga. LEXIS 428
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided October 13, 1933·No. No. 9496·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Bussell, C. J.

The petition prayed for an injunction to prevent the defendants from enforcing, as to the plaintiffs, an ordinance of the City of Gainesville, requiring payment of a tax for conducting the business of undertaking in the city. Upon interlocutory hearing the evidence was conflicting as to whether the plaintiffs carried on the business of undertaking within the limits of that city. The court refused an injunction. The case falls within the well-settled rule of this court, that the discretion of the trial judge in granting or refusing an injunction will not be interfered with, unless there is a manifest abuse of discretion.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Vickers v. City of Gainesville, 171 S.E. 299, 177 Ga. 793, 1933 Ga. LEXIS 428 (Ga. 1933).

171 S.E. 299 (Vickers v. City of Gainesville) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tift v. Farmers Bank of Tifton
77 S.E.2d 505 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1953)
Associated Mutuals Inc. v. Coe
26 S.E.2d 450 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1943)
Moon v. Clark
14 S.E.2d 481 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1941)
Thompson v. Mutual Investment Corp.
4 S.E.2d 44 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1939)