Vickers v. Carlsen
71 A.D.2d 1047, 421 N.Y.S.2d 551, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13417
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 14, 1979·Published
Opinion
—Order unanimously affirmed, without costs, for the reasons stated at Special Term, Bayger, J. (See Matter of Rutter v Coveney, 38 NY2d 993; Matter of Berry v Dodd, 38 NY2d 995; Matter of Berger v Acito, 64 AD2d 949; Matter of Fiorella v Mahoney, 64 AD2d 1008.) Doerr, J., not participating. (Appeal from order of Erie Supreme Court—Election Law.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Hancock, Jr., Schnepp, Doerr and Witmer, JJ. (Decided Aug. 23, 1979.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Vickers v. Carlsen, 71 A.D.2d 1047, 421 N.Y.S.2d 551, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13417 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1979).
71 A.D.2d 1047 (Vickers v. Carlsen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Rutter v. Coveney
348 N.E.2d 913 (New York Court of Appeals, 1976)
Berry v. Dodd
348 N.E.2d 914 (New York Court of Appeals, 1976)
Berger v. Acito
64 A.D.2d 949 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)
Fiorella v. Mahoney
64 A.D.2d 1008 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)