Vick v. Vick

195 S.E.2d 399, 230 Ga. 36, 1973 Ga. LEXIS 800
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided January 4, 1973·No. 27593·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

UNDERCOFLER, Justice.

The sole issue presented in this case is whether the trial court can alter a judgment awarding custody of a minor child during the same term without holding an additional evidentiary hearing. "[A] court has plenary control over its judgments, orders and decrees during the term at which they were made, and, in the exercise of a sound discretion, may revise, revoke, or modify them.” Dover v. Dover, 205 Ga. 241 (1) (53 SE2d 492); Barrett v. Manus, 219 Ga. 693 (135 SE2d 430).

It follows that there is no merit in this contention of the appellant.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Vick v. Vick, 195 S.E.2d 399, 230 Ga. 36, 1973 Ga. LEXIS 800 (Ga. 1973).

195 S.E.2d 399 (Vick v. Vick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Houston General Insurance v. Stein Steel & Supply Co.
215 S.E.2d 511 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1975)
Askren v. Allen
208 S.E.2d 165 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1974)
Camera Shop, Inc. v. G a F Corp.
202 S.E.2d 241 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1973)