Vick v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Vick v. State

221 S.W.2d 289, 153 Tex. Crim. 490, 1949 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1239

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedJune 15, 1949

DocketNo. 24413

StatusPublished

This text of 221 S.W.2d 289 (Vick v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Vick v. State, 221 S.W.2d 289, 153 Tex. Crim. 490, 1949 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1239 (Tex. 1949).

Pincite

Opinion

KRUEGER, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of the offense of burglary on an indictment which charged him with the primary offense of burglary and also charged that theretofore he had been twice convicted of felonies less than capital. His punishment was assessed at confinement in the state penitentiary for life.

[491]*491The record is before us without any bills of exception or any objections to the court’s charge. The indictment seems to be in due and legal form. Consequently, the only question presented for review is the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain his conviction. We have carefully reviewed the statement of facts and find that the evidence is ample to sustain every allegation in the indictment.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

KRUEGER, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of the offense of burglary on an indictment which charged him with the primary offense of burglary and also charged that theretofore he had been twice convicted of felonies less than capital. His punishment was assessed at confinement in the state penitentiary for life.

[491]*491The record is before us without any bills of exception or any objections to the court’s charge. The indictment seems to be in due and legal form. Consequently, the only question presented for review is the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain his conviction. We have carefully reviewed the statement of facts and find that the evidence is ample to sustain every allegation in the indictment.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

221 S.W.2d 289, 153 Tex. Crim. 490, 1949 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1239, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vick-v-state-texcrimapp-1949.