Vick v. Lungaro

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Vick v. Lungaro

231 So. 2d 65, 1970 La. App. LEXIS 5481

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedFebruary 2, 1970

DocketNo. 7870

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 231 So. 2d 65 (Vick v. Lungaro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Vick v. Lungaro, 231 So. 2d 65, 1970 La. App. LEXIS 5481 (La. Ct. App. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

LOTTINGER, Judge.

This is a suit filed by Roy F. Vick against Leon Lungaro and others wherein petitioners seek damages as a result of a three car collision.

This matter was one of four consolidated cases which were tried together by the Lower Court after which the Lower Court rendered judgment in favor of petitioner, Roy F. Vick in the sum of $348.80, in favor of Mr. Vick on behalf of his three minor children, Frank Vick, Mark Vick and Diane Vick, in the sum of $150.00 each, and in favor of Mrs. Vick in the sum of $1,000.00, said judgment being against the heirs of Leon Lungaro and Hanover Insurance Company.

For the reasons assigned in our decree this day handed down in suit entitled Jones, et ux versus Lungaro, et al., La.App., 231 So.2d 60 on the docket of this Court, the judgment of the Lower Court will be affirmed, all cost of this appeal to be paid by defendants.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI