Vick v. . Flowers
This text of 5 N.C. 321 (Vick v. . Flowers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
From Chatham. To this bill the defendant demurred, and for cause of demurrer alleged that the bill did not contain any matter of equity, whereon the court could grant any decree or give the complainant any relief or assistance as against the defendant. And the questions arising upon this demurrer were sent to this Court for the opinion of the judges.
This case being similar, in many of its circumstances, to the case ofJackson v. Marshall, post, 323, and both cases depending in part upon the same principles, the facts of the latter case are here stated.
Cited: Dobson v. Erwin,
(323)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
5 N.C. 321, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vick-v-flowers-nc-1809.