Vick v. . Flowers

5 N.C. 321
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided July 5, 1809·Published

Opinion

From Chatham. To this bill the defendant demurred, and for cause of demurrer alleged that the bill did not contain any matter of equity, whereon the court could grant any decree or give the complainant any relief or assistance as against the defendant. And the questions arising upon this demurrer were sent to this Court for the opinion of the judges.

This case being similar, in many of its circumstances, to the case ofJackson v. Marshall, post, 323, and both cases depending in part upon the same principles, the facts of the latter case are here stated.

Cited: Dobson v. Erwin, 18 N.C. 575; York v. Merritt, 80 N.C. 290;Pittman v. Pittman, 107 N.C. 162; Bank v. Adrian, 116 N.C. 543.

(323)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Vick v. . Flowers, 5 N.C. 321 (N.C. 1809).

5 N.C. 321 (Vick v. . Flowers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Den Ex. Dem. Dobson v. Erwin
18 N.C. 569 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1836)
York v. . Merritt
80 N.C. 285 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1879)
Pittman v. . Pittman
12 S.E. 61 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1890)
Bank of New Hanover v. Adrian
116 N.C. 537 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1895)