Vichnes v. Transcontinental & Western Air, Inc.

173 Misc. 631, 18 N.Y.S.2d 603, 1940 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1542
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided March 8, 1940·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinions

Per Curiam.

Since the facts are not in dispute the question presented is one of law. Plaintiff, a fifteen-year-old infant, paid defendant $160 for one meal and transportation from New York to Los Angeles. On returning to New York she repudiated the transaction, demanded return of the amount paid, and brought this action in which she has been granted summary judgment.

No controlling authority sustaining such a determination has been brought to our attention, and we are unable to agree with the decision below.

The contracts of infants are voidable, not void, and there is no basis for rescission here in view of the concession that the reasonable value of the transportation was the sum paid by plaintiff.

Judgment and order granting summary judgment reversed, with ten dollars costs, and defendant’s motion for summary judgment granted, with costs.

Shientag and Noonan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Vichnes v. Transcontinental & Western Air, Inc., 173 Misc. 631, 18 N.Y.S.2d 603, 1940 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1542 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

173 Misc. 631 (Vichnes v. Transcontinental & Western Air, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

I.C. v. Delta Galil USA
135 F. Supp. 3d 196 (S.D. New York, 2015)
Scott Eden Management v. Kavovit
149 Misc. 2d 262 (New York Supreme Court, 1990)
CBS, Inc.(CBS Records Division) v. Tucker
412 F. Supp. 1222 (S.D. New York, 1976)
Cidis v. White
71 Misc. 2d 481 (Nassau County District Court, 1972)
Eastern Airlines, Inc. v. Stuhl
65 Misc. 2d 901 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1970)