Vicente v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Vicente v. State

84 So. 3d 376, 2012 WL 874673, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 4208

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 14, 2012

DocketNo. 5D12-634

StatusPublished

This text of 84 So. 3d 376 (Vicente v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Vicente v. State, 84 So. 3d 376, 2012 WL 874673, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 4208 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We find that Petitioner’s verified Motion for Disqualification of the trial judge was legally sufficient. See Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.330(d). Accordingly, we quash the trial court’s order denying Petitioner’s motion. We withhold issuing the writ, as we assume that the trial court will act in conformance with this opinion.

ORDER QUASHED.

ORFINGER, C.J., MONACO and COHEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We find that Petitioner’s verified Motion for Disqualification of the trial judge was legally sufficient. See Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.330(d). Accordingly, we quash the trial court’s order denying Petitioner’s motion. We withhold issuing the writ, as we assume that the trial court will act in conformance with this opinion.

ORDER QUASHED.

ORFINGER, C.J., MONACO and COHEN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

84 So. 3d 376, 2012 WL 874673, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 4208, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vicente-v-state-fladistctapp-2012.