Vicente v. Hilo Medical Investors, Ltd.

CourtHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals
DecidedNovember 7, 2022
DocketCAAP-22-0000245
StatusPublished

This text of Vicente v. Hilo Medical Investors, Ltd. (Vicente v. Hilo Medical Investors, Ltd.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Vicente v. Hilo Medical Investors, Ltd., (hawapp 2022).

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX 07-NOV-2022 07:57 AM Dkt. 43 ODSLJ NO. CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I

DWIGHT J. VICENTE, Claimant-Appellant-Appellant, v. HILO MEDICAL INVESTORS, LTD., Employer-Appellee-Appellee, and AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE COMPANY/AIG CLAIMS SERVICES, Insurance Carrier-Appellee-Appellee, and JOHN MULLEN & COMPANY, INC., Insurance-Adjuster-Appellee-Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS APPEALS BOARD (CASE NO. AB 2015-259(H)(S); DCD NO. 1-87-00882)

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL FOR LACK OF APPELLATE JURISDICTION (By: Leonard, Presiding Judge, Nakasone and Chan, JJ.) Upon review of the record, it appears that we lack appellate jurisdiction over self-represented Claimant-Appellant- Appellant Dwight J. Vicente's (Vicente) appeal from a purported order denying Vicente's motion to continue trial by the Labor and Industrial Relations Appeals Board (LIRAB), in Case No. 2015- 259(H)(S), because the record on appeal in CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX does not include a final decision or order by the LIRAB regarding its review of a June 3, 2015 decision by the Director of the Department of Labor and Industrial Relations regarding Vicente's claim for further workers' compensation benefits for a May 3, 1987 injury. An aggrieved party may appeal from a final decision and order by the LIRAB directly to this court under Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) §§ 386-88 (2015) and 91-14 (2012). For purposes of HRS § 91-14(a), "final order" means "an order ending the proceedings, leaving nothing further to be accomplished[;] . . . Consequently, an order is not final if the rights of a party NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

involved remain undetermined or if the matter is retained for further action." Bocalbos v. Kapiolani Med. Ctr. for Women & Child., 89 Hawai i 436, 439, 974 P.2d 1026, 1029 (1999) (cleaned up). No final judgment has been entered in the underlying proceeding. Absent an appealable, final decision or order in LIRAB Case No. 2015-259(H)(S), the appeal is premature and we lack jurisdiction. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that appellate case number CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX is dismissed for lack of appellate jurisdiction. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai i, November 7, 2022.

/s/ Katherine G. Leonard Presiding Judge

/s/ Karen T. Nakasone Associate Judge

/s/ Derrick H.M. Chan Associate Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bocalbos v. Kapiolani Medical Center for Women & Children
974 P.2d 1026 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Vicente v. Hilo Medical Investors, Ltd., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vicente-v-hilo-medical-investors-ltd-hawapp-2022.