Vicente Reyes v. State
This text of Vicente Reyes v. State (Vicente Reyes v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-12-00267-CR
Vicente REYES, Appellant
v.
The STATE of Texas, Appellee
From the 290th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2006CR6988 The Honorable Sharon MacRae, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice Karen Angelini, Justice Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice
Delivered and Filed: July 5, 2012
DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION
Appellant has filed a notice of appeal seeking to appeal the trial court’s order denying his
motion for a judgment nunc pro tunc. On June 12, 2012, we ordered appellant to show cause in
writing why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Our order noted that
the denial of a motion for a judgment nunc pro tunc is not an appealable order; instead, the
proper remedy to obtain review of the denial of a motion for judgment nunc pro tunc is by
petition for writ of mandamus. See Caceras v. State, No. 04-10-00132-CR, 2010 WL 726884, at 04-12-00267-CR
*1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio Mar. 3, 2010, no pet.) (not designated for publication); Castor v.
State, 205 S.W.3d 666, 667 (Tex. App.—Waco 2006, no pet.). Appellant did not respond to our
order. Because we do not have jurisdiction to consider an appeal of an order denying a motion
for a judgment nunc pro tunc, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
DO NOT PUBLISH
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Vicente Reyes v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vicente-reyes-v-state-texapp-2012.