Vicente Ramirez v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided September 17, 2018·No. 05-18-00228-CR·Published

Opinion

Order entered September 17, 2018

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-18-00228-CR

VICENTE RAMIREZ, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 291st Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F16-18106-U

ORDER

Appellant’s brief was initially due May 23, 2018. After granting two extensions, the

Court cautioned appellant that the failure to file his brief by August 8th might result in this

appeal being abated for a hearing under rule 38.8. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b)(3). To date, no

brief has been filed and we have had no communication from appellant.

Therefore, we ORDER the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why appellant’s

brief has not been filed. In this regard, the trial court shall make appropriate findings and

recommendations and determine whether appellant desires to prosecute this appeal or whether

appellant has abandoned the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b). If the trial court cannot obtain

appellant’s presence at the hearing, the trial court shall conduct the hearing in appellant’s absence. See Meza v. State, 742 S.W.2d 708 (Tex. App.–Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per

curiam). If appellant is indigent, the trial court is ORDERED to take such measures as may be

necessary to assure effective representation, which may include appointment of new counsel.

We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include

written findings and recommendations, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this

order.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send a copy of this order to the Honorable Stephanie Mitchell,

Presiding Judge, 291st Judicial District Court; to counsel Lawrence B. Mitchell; and to the

Dallas County District Attorney.

This appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The

appeal shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are

received, whichever is earlier.

/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Vicente Ramirez v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2018).

Vicente Ramirez v. State (Vicente Ramirez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Meza v. State
742 S.W.2d 708 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1987)