Vicars v. Clarke

653 F. App'x 789
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJune 3, 2016
DocketNo. 15-7546
StatusPublished

This text of 653 F. App'x 789 (Vicars v. Clarke) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Vicars v. Clarke, 653 F. App'x 789 (4th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Joel Vicars appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the Defendants on his complaint asserting claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) and the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000cc to 2000cc-5 (2012). We have reviewed the record and fínd no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Vicars v. Clarke, No. 7:14-cv-00620-NKM-RSB, 2015 WL 5043049 (W.D. Va. Aug. 26, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
653 F. App'x 789, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vicars-v-clarke-ca4-2016.