Viatris Healthcare (Pty) Ltd v. Sedia Biosciences Corporation

S.D. New York

Viatris Healthcare (Pty) Ltd v. Sedia Biosciences Corporation

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided October 24, 2025·No. 1:25-cv-08790·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK VIATRIS HEALTHCARE (PTY) LTD, Petitioner, -against- 25-CV-8790 (AS) SEDIA BIOSCIENCES CORPORATION, ORDER Respondent.

ARUN SUBRAMANIAN, United States District Judge: On October 23, 2025, Petitioner filed a petition to confirm an arbitration award. Proceedings to confirm an arbitration award must be “treated as akin to a motion for summary judgment.” D.H. Blair & Co., Inc. v. Gottdiener, 462 F.3d 95, 109 (2d Cir. 2006). Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Petitioner shall file and serve any additional materials with which it intends to support its petition to confirm by November 13, 2025. Respondent’s opposition, if any, is due on December 4, 2025. Petitioner’s reply, if any, is due December 11, 2025. Petitioner shall serve the petition and all supporting papers, as well as this Order, upon Respondent pursuant to Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure no later than November 13, 2025, and shall file an affidavit of such service with the court no later than November 14, 2025.

SO ORDERED. Dated: October 24, 2025 New York, New York

ARUN SUBRAMANIAN United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK VIATRIS HEALTHCARE (PTY) LTD, Petitioner, -against- 25-CV-8790 (AS) SEDIA BIOSCIENCES CORPORATION, ORDER Respondent.

ARUN SUBRAMANIAN, United States District Judge: On October 23, 2025, Petitioner filed a petition to confirm an arbitration award. Proceedings to confirm an arbitration award must be “treated as akin to a motion for summary judgment.” D.H. Blair & Co., Inc. v. Gottdiener, 462 F.3d 95, 109 (2d Cir. 2006). Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Petitioner shall file and serve any additional materials with which it intends to support its petition to confirm by November 13, 2025. Respondent’s opposition, if any, is due on December 4, 2025. Petitioner’s reply, if any, is due December 11, 2025. Petitioner shall serve the petition and all supporting papers, as well as this Order, upon Respondent pursuant to Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure no later than November 13, 2025, and shall file an affidavit of such service with the court no later than November 14, 2025.

SO ORDERED. Dated: October 24, 2025 New York, New York

ARUN SUBRAMANIAN United States District Judge

Viatris Healthcare (Pty) Ltd v. Sedia Biosciences Corporation, (S.D.N.Y. 2025).

Pincite

Viatris Healthcare (Pty) Ltd v. Sedia Biosciences Corporation (Viatris Healthcare (Pty) Ltd v. Sedia Biosciences Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related