Viatical Administrators, Inc. v. Blue Paper, Inc.

Eleventh Circuit

Viatical Administrators, Inc. v. Blue Paper, Inc.

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

DecidedDecember 12, 2008

Docket08-11333

StatusUnpublished

This text of Viatical Administrators, Inc. v. Blue Paper, Inc. (Viatical Administrators, Inc. v. Blue Paper, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Viatical Administrators, Inc. v. Blue Paper, Inc., (11th Cir. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT DEC 12, 2008 No. 08-11333 THOMAS K. KAHN CLERK

D. C. Docket No. 07-61517 CV-PCH

VIATICAL ADMINISTRATORS, INC., A Colorado Corporation,

Plaintiff- Counter-Defendant- Appellant,

versus

BLUE PAPER, INC., A Florida Corporation, et al.,

Defendants- Cross-Defendants,

BANKUNITED, FSB, a Federal Savings Bank, Defendant- Counter-Claimant- Appellee,

900 HILLSBORO MILE, INC., A Florida not-for-profit corporation, et al.,

Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida

(December 12, 2008)

Before DUBINA, BLACK and FAY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Because we conclude from the record that the district court correctly

determined that BankUnited’s mortgage has priority over Viatical Administrators,

Inc.’s equitable liens, we affirm the district court’s judgment.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI