Vianello Forensic Consulting v. Pitman Utility Products, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Vianello Forensic Consulting v. Pitman Utility Products, Inc.

517 S.W.3d 679, 2017 WL 2118651, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 436

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 16, 2017·No. WD 79127·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Vianello Forensic Consulting, LLC, appeals the judgment of the Jackson County Circuit Court following bench trial in a civil ease. It raises six points on appeal complaining about two issues. First, it says the trial court erred in relying on opinion [680] testimony by an expert witness. Second, it says the trial court erred in relying on settlement discussions between the parties and settlements made by pertinent parties. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Vianello Forensic Consulting, LLC, appeals the judgment of the Jackson County Circuit Court following bench trial in a civil ease. It raises six points on appeal complaining about two issues. First, it says the trial court erred in relying on opinion [680] testimony by an expert witness. Second, it says the trial court erred in relying on settlement discussions between the parties and settlements made by pertinent parties. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Vianello Forensic Consulting v. Pitman Utility Products, Inc., 517 S.W.3d 679, 2017 WL 2118651, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 436 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

517 S.W.3d 679 (Vianello Forensic Consulting v. Pitman Utility Products, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.