Vianello Forensic Consulting v. Pitman Utility Products, Inc.

517 S.W.3d 679, 2017 WL 2118651, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 436
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedMay 16, 2017
DocketWD 79127
StatusPublished

This text of 517 S.W.3d 679 (Vianello Forensic Consulting v. Pitman Utility Products, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Vianello Forensic Consulting v. Pitman Utility Products, Inc., 517 S.W.3d 679, 2017 WL 2118651, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 436 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Vianello Forensic Consulting, LLC, appeals the judgment of the Jackson County Circuit Court following bench trial in a civil ease. It raises six points on appeal complaining about two issues. First, it says the trial court erred in relying on opinion [680]*680testimony by an expert witness. Second, it says the trial court erred in relying on settlement discussions between the parties and settlements made by pertinent parties. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
517 S.W.3d 679, 2017 WL 2118651, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 436, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vianello-forensic-consulting-v-pitman-utility-products-inc-moctapp-2017.