Viall v. Goforth

Appellate Court of Illinois

Viall v. Goforth

6 Ill. App. 156, 1880 Ill. App. LEXIS 45

DecidedApril 2, 1880

StatusPublished

This text of 6 Ill. App. 156 (Viall v. Goforth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Viall v. Goforth, 6 Ill. App. 156, 1880 Ill. App. LEXIS 45 (Ill. Ct. App. 1880).

Pincite

Opinions

Per Curiam.

Assuming there was error in the ruling and remarks of the court, with reference to the admission of evidence as to the reasonable value of the services, we think the appellant having accepted the course indicated by the court could not "afterwards object thereto. Considering all the evidence, we cannot see that any injustice has been done, nor that there was error in refusing the instructions referred to in the brief.

The judgment is therefore affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Assuming there was error in the ruling and remarks of the court, with reference to the admission of evidence as to the reasonable value of the services, we think the appellant having accepted the course indicated by the court could not "afterwards object thereto. Considering all the evidence, we cannot see that any injustice has been done, nor that there was error in refusing the instructions referred to in the brief.

The judgment is therefore affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 Ill. App. 156, 1880 Ill. App. LEXIS 45, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/viall-v-goforth-illappct-1880.