Vialet v. Riverbay Corp

31 A.D.3d 251, 817 N.Y.S.2d 499

This text of 31 A.D.3d 251 (Vialet v. Riverbay Corp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Vialet v. Riverbay Corp, 31 A.D.3d 251, 817 N.Y.S.2d 499 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

Order Supreme Court, Bronx County (Douglas E. McKeon, J.), entered January 6, 2006, which denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment, with leave to renew at the time the action is scheduled for trial, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the motion granted and the complaint dismissed. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly.

Despite the unusual circumstances alluded to by the motion court, plaintiff has failed to establish that her fall was due to any negligence of defendant. Concur—Buckley, P.J., Andrias, Marlow, Nardelli and Catterson, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
31 A.D.3d 251, 817 N.Y.S.2d 499, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vialet-v-riverbay-corp-nyappdiv-2006.