Vialet v. Lalande

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Vialet v. Lalande

6 Mart. (N.S.) 530

DecidedMarch 15, 1828

StatusPublished

This text of 6 Mart. (N.S.) 530 (Vialet v. Lalande) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Vialet v. Lalande, 6 Mart. (N.S.) 530 (La. 1828).

Pincite

Opinion

Porter, J.

delivered the opinion of the court, This is an action in which the pláintiff claims damages for a breach of an agreement which he alleges the defendant entered into with him. The contract has been denied, and the amount of the damages disputed. Both depend on the weight which ought to be attached to the conflicting testimony given on the trial. Of this the jury'”'were the judges, and there is nothing shewn to authorise us to set aside the verdict they rendered.

It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed, that the judgment of the district court be affirmed with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Porter, J.

delivered the opinion of the court, This is an action in which the pláintiff claims damages for a breach of an agreement which he alleges the defendant entered into with him. The contract has been denied, and the amount of the damages disputed. Both depend on the weight which ought to be attached to the conflicting testimony given on the trial. Of this the jury'”'were the judges, and there is nothing shewn to authorise us to set aside the verdict they rendered.

It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed, that the judgment of the district court be affirmed with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 Mart. (N.S.) 530, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vialet-v-lalande-la-1828.